← Investigations

Investigations

The Flight Logs:
what they can’t show

Two pilots kept handwritten logbooks across twenty-two years — date, departure, arrival, and names in a remarks column. They are the most quoted documents in this case and the least understood. Published flight counts range from 1,497 to 3,652 because the handwriting is transcribed differently by different people. In the tabulated records the passenger manifests stop in January 2006, ten months after the Palm Beach investigation opened, and everything after is FAA data with no names on it. A federal court filing states that three young women were “conspicuously absent” from the logs. Appearing in them is not an accusation — and absence from them is not a clearance.

Span
Apr 1991 – Sep 2013
Named passengers
289
Flight counts published
1,497 – 3,652
Manifests end
January 2006
Unnamed entries after
271
Read this first

Appearing in the flight logs is not evidence of wrongdoing. Most passengers were employees, business associates and social contacts, and many flights predate the 2008 conviction entirely. The logs establish that a named person was on an aircraft on a date. They establish nothing else, and this page is largely about what they cannot show.

The Finding
The most-cited document in this case is also the least reliable one — and the passenger names stop in January 2006.
Twenty-two years of handwritten pilot logbooks, from April 1991 to September 2013. But in the tabulated records, passenger manifests end in January 2006 — ten months after the Palm Beach investigation began. Everything after that is FAA data with no names on it. And a 2015 federal filing states that three young women were “conspicuously absent” from the logs.

No document in this story is quoted more often or understood less well.

What they actually are: handwritten records kept by two pilots — Larry Visoski, chief pilot for roughly 25 years, and David Rodgers — noting date, departure, arrival, and names in a remarks column. They were kept to satisfy aviation requirements. They were never intended as a record of who was where with whom.

Which is why the counts never agree. Independent databases list anywhere from 1,497 to 3,652 flights depending on what is counted and how illegible handwriting is transcribed. Rodgers’ tabulated logs alone hold 5,001 records across roughly 1,149 flights and 289 named passengers. There is still no authoritative figure.

The two gaps are what matter, and neither gets much attention.

First, the names stop. In Rodgers’ logs the passenger manifests end in January 2006. The 271 subsequent entries are FAA records only. The Palm Beach investigation had opened in March 2005. The entire period covering the investigation, the non-prosecution agreement, and the decade after it has no passenger record in this source at all.

Second, women appear to be missing. A January 2015 filing in Jane Doe #1 and #2 v. USA says of three young women: “The existence of these three ‘females’ is conspicuously absent from the Rogers’ logs.” If passengers were omitted, the omission runs in exactly the direction that matters.

Which produces the conclusion most coverage gets backwards. Being in the logs is not an accusation. And because the record is demonstrably incomplete, not being in them is not a clearance either. The document is weaker evidence in both directions than almost anyone treats it as.

The Numbers, Which Do Not Agree

Apr 1991 – Sep 2013 — span of the logbooks entered in US v. Maxwell (GX-661, GX-662).

5,001 records · ~1,149 flights · 289 named passengers — Rodgers’ tabulated logs, Nov 1995 to Dec 2015.

1,497 to 3,652 flights — range across independent public databases.

5,233 records — the October 2025 estate subpoena batch. Only 213 have searchable text.

271 entries after January 2006 carry no passenger names at all.

Section 01

The Aircraft

Boeing 727-31N908JE

The aircraft the tabloids named the “Lolita Express.” Epstein never used that name; it is a press invention, and this archive uses the registration. Acquired in the 1990s, operated through at least 2016.

GulfstreamN909JE

Used for shorter trips and smaller groups. Logged separately from the 727 in some records. A later G550 appears as N212JE.

Bell 430 helicopter

Used for the short hop from St. Thomas to Little St. James — the island’s runway could not take a fixed-wing aircraft. Anyone who reached the island did so by helicopter or boat, and those movements are recorded differently.

Cessna 421

A twin-engine propeller aircraft, the smallest in the fleet.

Section 02

The Record

25 Apr 1991
The logs begin

The earliest entry in the pilot logbooks entered as evidence in US v. Maxwell. Exhibits GX-661 and GX-662 cover April 1991 to September 2013 — twenty-two years of private aviation.

1990s–2010s
Who wrote them

Larry Visoski, chief pilot for roughly 25 to 28 years, and David Rodgers. The logs are handwritten — date, departure, arrival, and passenger names in a remarks column. They were kept for aviation purposes, not as evidence.

Jan 2006
The names stop

In Rodgers’ tabulated logs, passenger manifests end in January 2006. The 271 entries after that date are FAA records only — no names. The Palm Beach investigation had begun in March 2005.

2015
“Conspicuously absent”

A court filing in Jane Doe #1 and #2 v. USA states of three young women: “The existence of these three ‘females’ is conspicuously absent from the Rogers’ logs.” A federal filing asserting that female passengers were left out of the record.

2015
Gawker publishes

112 pages of Rodgers’ handwritten logs covering 2002–2005, obtained through Giuffre v. Maxwell, are published unredacted — names that are blacked out in the later Maxwell trial exhibit are visible in this version.

2021
Both pilots testify

Visoski is a prosecution witness at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial. Rodgers also testifies, and had earlier given an FBI proffer in the SDNY investigation. Rodgers confirmed collecting a victim from Interlochen but maintained he never witnessed sexual activity or saw unaccompanied minors on flights. During the civil litigation he was represented by an attorney paid by Epstein.

Feb 2025
Phase One

Government Exhibit 662-RR — 118 pages of the original handwritten logbooks — is released in the DOJ’s first tranche.

17 Oct 2025
The estate subpoena

5,233 scanned flight records arrive in Batch 3: eAPIS departure and arrival manifests, pilot logbook pages, and FAA records for N908JE, N909JE and N212JE. Only 213 have searchable text.

2026
What the databases hold

Independent indexes now list between 1,497 and 3,652 flights depending on what is counted. Rodgers’ tabulated logs alone contain 5,001 records across ~1,149 flights and 289 named passengers. There is still no single authoritative count.

Section 03

What They Can and Cannot Show

Six things to hold in mind before citing a flight log — including two that cut against the people the logs are usually used to accuse, and two that cut the other way.

They record travel, not conduct

A flight log establishes that a person was on an aircraft on a date. It establishes nothing else. Most passengers were employees, associates and social contacts flying for entirely ordinary reasons, and many flights predate the 2008 conviction. Appearing in the logs is not an accusation and this archive does not treat it as one.

They are handwritten

Names are sometimes illegible, sometimes initials only, sometimes abbreviated. Transcriptions disagree with one another, which is why published flight counts differ by thousands.

They are incomplete

Not every flight was logged, and records for some periods are missing entirely. The logs were kept to satisfy aviation requirements, not to document who travelled.

The names stop in 2006

Rodgers’ passenger manifests end in January 2006; everything after is FAA data without names. The period covering the investigation, the plea, and the decade that followed has no passenger record at all in this source.

Women appear to be missing

A 2015 federal court filing states that three young women were “conspicuously absent from the Rogers’ logs.” If passengers were omitted, the logs understate exactly the category of travel that matters most.

Absence proves nothing either

Because the record is incomplete, not appearing in the logs is not exoneration, just as appearing is not an accusation. The document is weaker evidence in both directions than it is usually treated as being.

Section 04

The Men Who Wrote Them

The logs exist because two employees kept them, and both later testified.

Larry Visoski flew for Epstein for roughly 25 to 28 years and was a prosecution witness at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial in 2021, describing what he had observed across nearly three decades.

David Rodgers also testified, and had given an FBI proffer in the SDNY investigation. Unlike some in Epstein’s employ, he cooperated and produced his logs — which is the reason a substantial part of this record exists at all.

His testimony is carefully bounded. He confirmed collecting a victim from Interlochen, the Michigan arts academy. He maintained he never witnessed sexual activity and never saw unaccompanied minors on flights.

And one detail belongs on the record. During the civil litigation, Rodgers was represented by an attorney paid by Epstein. That is the same structural position every household employee occupied — direct knowledge, no independent resources, and a legal bill covered by the person they might testify against.

Neither pilot has been accused of any offence, and both gave evidence that was used at a criminal trial. The logs they kept convicted nobody by themselves, but they corroborated the movements survivors described, which is what documentary evidence is actually for.

The honest summary of this whole document class: the flight logs are not the smoking gun the internet treats them as, and they are not nothing. They are a partial, handwritten, incomplete travel record that lines up with testimony — and that stops naming anyone in January 2006.

Where the logs came from
Giuffre v. Maxwell — subpoenaed in civil litigation; 112 pages covering 2002–2005 published unredacted in 2015.
US v. Maxwell — GX-661 and GX-662, the complete logbooks, April 1991 to September 2013. Many exhibits remain sealed.
DOJ Phase One, Feb 2025 — Exhibit 662-RR, 118 pages of the original handwritten pages.
Estate subpoena, Batch 3, Oct 2025 — 5,233 scanned records including eAPIS manifests and FAA data.
TECS II — US Customs records, a separate and independent source.
The unredacted 2015 version shows names that are blacked out in the later trial exhibit.

Section 05

Open Questions

?
Why do the passenger names stop in 2006?
Rodgers’ manifests end that January; later entries are FAA-only. No explanation for the change in record-keeping has been given.
?
Were female passengers omitted?
A 2015 federal filing says three young women were “conspicuously absent” from the logs. Whether omissions were systematic has never been determined.
?
How many flights were there really?
Public counts range from 1,497 to 3,652. No authoritative reconciliation of the sources has been published.
?
What is in the sealed Maxwell exhibits?
Around 169 exhibits from the trial remain sealed, including flight material. None has been released under the Transparency Act.
?
Who travelled to the island?
Little St. James was reached by helicopter or boat, not by the jets. Those movements are recorded separately and far less completely.
?
Why do only 213 of 5,233 records have text?
The October 2025 batch was released as scans. The overwhelming majority is not machine-searchable, which limits what any analysis can find.

Section 06

Sources

Document index

The Tabulated Logs

Rodgers’ 5,001 records, the 289 named passengers, and the note that manifests end in January 2006.

Browse the logs →
Court exhibit

US v. Maxwell, GX-662-RR

118 pages of the original handwritten pilot logbooks, released in DOJ Phase One.

epsteinarchive.org →
Document index

David Rodgers

The FBI proffer, the Interlochen testimony, the Epstein-paid attorney, and the “conspicuously absent” filing.

Read the profile →
Reference

The Fleet

The 727, the Gulfstreams, the Cessna and the helicopter — and why the island needed the last of them.

epsteingpt.org →
Companion report

Who Actually Flew

The passenger frequency — and why almost no celebrities appear near the top.

Read the report →
Companion report

Reading the Files

The law required searchable. The government released scans. AI filled the gap — and nobody audits it.

Read the report →
Cross-reference

Bill Clinton

The 2002 Africa trip — the single most documented use of the aircraft.

Read the profile →
Cross-reference

The Staff

The employees who saw the most, and the legal position they were in.

Read the report →
Cross-reference

The Files

What has been released, what is withheld, and what remains sealed.

Read the report →
Cross-reference

Properties

Little St. James, and how people actually got there.

Read the report →